ASPJ Home Page

Volume 35 Issue 2, Summer 2021

  • Published
  • Air & Space Power Journal, Air University, Maxwell AFB, AL
  • Thinking about Thinking: Training Aircrew to Make Decisions in Complex Situations

    Lt Col E. Aaron Brady, USAF

    This article examines concerns that the Air Force’s training model places too high an emphasis on solving clearly defined tactical problems. As a result, aircrew may have considerable difficulty making decisions in unclear situations. A more focused effort on teaching judgment rather than simple tactical problem-solving will make an aircrew more prepared to deal with the complex problems of current and future operating environments.

  • Game-Theoretic System Design in the Development of Space Power

    Capt Dustin L. Hayhurst Sr., USAF
    John M. Colombi, PhD

    Game-theoretic system design presents an opportunity for the development and enhancement of US space power. A new taxonomy of game-theoretic models affords decision-makers the ability to promote constructive policy and strategy. The effective development of space power increases America's security and prosperity.

  • Coming to a Theater near You: Evolving Air Combat to Counter Anti-Access and Area-Denial

    Maj Tom “Banger” Lawrence, Royal Canadian Air Force

    Using airpower to confront and prevail against anti-access/area-denial systems requires advancements in doctrine and technology. Western militaries are faced with the prospect that operations may be conducted from a position of disadvantage and must capitalize on emerging technologies and shift to an operational command and control (C2) model that is more resilient and flexible, thereby fundamentally altering the risk calculus at all levels of conflict.

  • OverSTEMulated: The Science and Art of Space Power Leadership

    Maj Brian Stewart, USSF
    Col Raj Agrawal, USSF

    Science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) degree requirements for new accessions into the US Space Force space operations career field are not useful predictors of performance, as measured by ranking among peer groups and competitive selection for space operations command positions. An overemphasis on STEM poses two risks—lack of diversity and insufficient supply.

  • Photo of Alec Wahlman, PhD

    A Concept for Next-Generation Combat Search and Rescue

    Col James R. Ayers, USAF, Retired
    Alec Wahlman, PhD

    Current US military combat search and rescue (CSAR) aircraft packages cannot follow advanced, stealthy aircraft deep into areas with advanced air defenses, presenting costs to air campaigns, aircrew morale, and even coalition operations. A combination of new equipment and a new concept for CSAR can give rescue packages the survivability and lethality needed to generate a reasonable chance of success, even against air defenses that could down a fifth-generation fighter.

  • Earthrise from the horizon of the Moon

    Every Airman and Guardian a Technologist: Reinvigorating a Disruptive Technology Culture

    Maj Gen William T. Cooley, USAF, PhD
    Col George M. Dougherty, USAF, PhD

    The US Air Force and US Space Force face an environment of military technological competition against great-power adversaries that may be more intense than at any time within the past hundred years. After decades of relative stability, the services must pivot to a new era that prioritizes the rapid development and fielding of the disruptive technologies that can provide sustained technological advantage.




Join the Airpower Dialogue

Read what Air and Space Power Journal readers and web site visitors have to say.  We welcome your comments and suggestions.  Visit the Air University Press on FacebookFacebook Logoand Join the Airpower Dialogue.

Connect with Us


Air University Press Logo