To fully understand the strategic trajectory of China's military capabilities, researchers must examine both the bureaucratic requirements-generation process and the physical manufacturing capabilities of the state. What are China's national-level policies that directly relate to or overlap with the aerospace industry, and how effectively can the PLA's acquisition system translate these high-level requirements into delivered military systems? Under the guidance of these overarching policies, what is the actual physical ability of the PRC's aerospace industry to emulate, innovate, develop, prototype, refine, and finalize advanced aerospace systems? Ultimately, what systemic bottlenecks or administrative inefficiencies exist within the PLA's acquisition-to-production pipeline, and how do these factors influence the timelines for China's aerospace force modernization?
- Harper, Col. Reginald, “China’s Army Aviation: Steady Progress but Doctrinal Gaps Remain,” AWC elective paper, 2019, 12 pgs.
- Reynolds, Maj. Rachel L., “Leapfrogs and Shortcuts: Paths to Technological Performance on IS and Chinese Strategic Evolutionary Landscapes,” SAASS thesis, 2020, 93 pgs.
-
- Diamond, Mary E., "From Prosperous-Nation-Strong-Military to China Dream: Securing China's Interests through Logistics Modernization," SAASS thesis, 2023, 99 pgs.
- Smith, Maj. Michael, "Chinese Capacity to Conduct a Joint Forcible Entry of Taiwan Viewed Through Materiel Acquisitions," SAASS thesis, 2023, 106 pgs.