Wild Blue Yonder (ISSN 2689-6478) is a new online journal and forum focused on airpower thought and dialogue. The journal seeks to foster discussion and debate among air, space, and cyberspace practitioners. We want to hear your ideas on how to reshape the way we think about air, space, and cyberspace. Our articles bridge the gap between academic thought and practical operational experience.

Visit Other Air University Press Journals

Published by the Air University Press, Wild Blue Yonder (WBY) is a digital-only, professional journal of the US Air Force and a forum for dialogue regarding airpower, space, multidomain operations, regional affairs, military history, and a host of other topics. The journal fosters intellectual and professional development for service members and the creation of meaningful interaction among academicians, operators, students, and policy makers.

Articles submitted to the journal must be unclassified, nonsensitive, and releasable to the public. The length and depth of articles can vary significantly, and we strive for a good balance between pieces of scholarly rigor and operational perspective. Submit all manuscripts to WildBlueYonder@hqau.af.edu.

The views and opinions expressed or implied in WBY are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government or international equivalents.

 Wild Blue Yonder
 600 Chennault Circle, Building 1405, Room 143
 Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6026
 Tel (334) 953-5560 Fax (334) 953-1451

Click here to subscribe, and we will keep you informed when we update the site.

You can reach our editorial staff at WildBlueYonder@hqau.af.edu

HomeWild Blue Yonder


  • Operational Plan Orange: American Strategy in a Western Pacific War

    While the likelihood of conflict between the United States and China is presently low, it cannot be completely excluded. The days of Western military superiority over China are ending, if not already over. China’s deployment of numerous ballistic missiles, modern aircraft, and cruise missiles amount to a strategic revolution in the western Pacific (WestPac), since China can now plausibly threaten a devastating surprise attack against American and allied bases and ships in the region. This means our bases and the oceans there are no longer sanctuaries, and the opening phases of such a war are all too likely to resemble the opening phases of World War II. This being the case, we need to think through a strategy for such a war in the WestPac—an Operational Plan Orange.
  • Caught in the Crossfire: The Impact of US–China Trade Tensions on Taiwanese Direct Investment in Mainland China

    As the world’s manufacturing center, mainland China imports large amounts of intermediate goods from its Asian neighbors, particularly Taiwan. As the key component supplier for mainland China, will Taiwan suffer from the increasing trade tensions between the United States and China? Since Taiwanese foreign direct investment (FDI)—primarily conducted by Taishang, Taiwanese business people—in mainland China is mostly export-oriented, and the United States is one of their major markets, would the potential trade war reduce Taiwan’s FDI in mainland China? How does the movement of Taishang during the trade war influence Taiwan’s economy, domestic politics, and the cross-strait relationship? Given the important strategic importance of Taishang for mainland China, have Beijing’s Taishang-preferential policies been helpful in neutralizing the negative impact of the trade war on the Taishang? Through descriptive analysis of the official Taishang data, we found that despite the trade war’s effects, there is a general increasing trend of Taishang projects in China. However, we also found that the number of Taishang in the manufacturing sector has been decreasing during the past several years and continues to decrease with the outbreak of the trade war. We also found an increasing trend for Taishang to invest in the non-manufacturing sectors in mainland China.
  • The US Withdrawal and the Scramble for Syria

    Amid an outbreak of protests and recriminations against the Trump administration for its “betrayal” of the erstwhile allies in the struggle against the Islamic State (ISIS), the following questions must be answered: (1) could such a situation have been avoided; (2) how will this policy impact on the power and prestige of the United States in the Middle East and beyond; (3) what does this incident indicate about the use of proxies by the United States in the Middle East and beyond; and (4) how does this affect the regional balance of power in Syria? With the benefit of painstaking research on the relations between the United States and the Syrian Kurds, this short article will endeavor to examine a situation is still unfolding and offer answers to the above four questions, while attempting also to identify winners and losers.
  • Realignment and Indian Airpower Doctrine

    With a shift in the balance of power in the Far East, as well as multiple challenges in the wider international security environment, several nations in the Indo-Pacific region have undergone significant changes in their defense postures. This is particularly the case with India, which has gone from a regional, largely Pakistan-focused, perspective to one involving global influence and power projection. This has presented ramifications for all the Indian armed services, but especially the Indian Air Force (IAF).

More Featured Articles

Cadet Perspectives

  • He Said, Xi Said: The Difficulties of Strategic Communication between the United States and China

    Communication or signaling is a necessity in all strategic deterrence operations. The United States and the PRC have an extensive history of failing to effectively communicate or signal one another. The implications of communications breakdown between the United States and the PRC could lead to misunderstanding and unintended escalation between nuclear powers. This would certainly devastate both nations, in addition to the global community. Given the history of communication failures between the United States and China, the United States needs to develop a more effective communications strategy to effectively deter China and meet the objectives of the NSS and the NDS.

More Cadet Perspectives


Celebrating the 75th anniversary end of WWII during Maxwell's two-day Beyond the Horizon Air and Space Show, April 18-19, 2020, the base will be open to the public both days.
Vice President Mike Pence swore in Gen. John W. Raymond as the first Chief of Space Operations at the White House, today.
On January 16, the Center for East Asia Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution hosted a panel of policy experts for a discussion on the results of the Taiwanese elections and their implications for domestic governance in Taiwan, relations between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, U.S.-Taiwan relations, and other policy implications.
Today's look Around the Air Force features the this year's 6 Spark Tank winners, a transition from textbooks to tablets in Basic Military Training, and some information on Air Force Connect.
US leadership in science and technology is at risk. As a percent of GDP, the United States is at one of its lowest levels of public funding for R&D spending since before World War II. Meanwhile, China has increased its funding in science and technology ten-fold. In a time of rapid technological change, can the United States keep up? This video highlights the Council on Foreign Relations–sponsored Independent Task Force on the future of US innovation.
Now that the US and China have inked a trade deal, where Beijing has committed to buying US$200 billion more in US goods, what does it mean for the two powers? Is a phase two deal on the cards? We spoke to Phil Levy, chief economist at Flexport.
Captain Bob Little, Stratton Commanding Officer, shares a few words with his crew regarding the importance of the Coast Guard's mission in the Indo-Pacific region. Vice Admiral Linda Fagan, Pacific Area Commander, then talks about the United States as a Pacific nation and the service's role in implementing the National Defense Strategy.
Soft power scholar Joseph Nye discusses the new challenges faced by public diplomacy practitioners in the modern global information environment. He recently published an essay reflecting on these topics as part of a special edition of the Hague Journal of Diplomacy titled, "Debating Public Diplomacy: Now and Next." More: https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/story/future-soft-power-and-public-diplomacy
Commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, Adm. Phil Davidson, joins a panel discussion on “U.S. China Relations: Impacts for National Security and Defense” at the Reagan National Defense Forum, Simi Valley, Cali, Dec. 7. The annual event brings together national security and military leaders to address national defense and to promote policies to strengthen the U.S. military.
The WestPac Rumrunner exercise brought Airmen and joint partners together to train and execute innovative ways to deploy forces in a contested environment. (U.S. Air Force video by Senior Airman Cynthia Belío)



  • Techno-Fetishism and Meta-Rhetoric: Assessing the Nature and Character of Past and Future Warfare

    What will future war look like? Answering this question requires first reflecting on wars of the past. Warfare, from antiquity to present, has been defined by a constant nature and evolving character heavily influenced by the technology-theory interaction. Future war portends more of the same; however, the continued threat posed by ideologically driven extremists and gray zone conflict will reduce the role of the military and significantly alter the operational domains as they are currently understood. As a result, the military that eschews the established patterns of techno-fetishism and embraces a strategy—which this article refers to as meta-rhetorical alignment—to win in the emerging perceptual domain, will ultimately have the greatest chance to achieve victory.
  • Building Partnership Capacity and Logistics

    The US Defense Security Cooperation Agency administers Building Partner Capacity programs funded with US appropriations and administered as cases within the foreign military sales (FMS) infrastructure. One of these programs enables the agency to provide logistics solutions to allied countries. Moreover, the Defense Contract Management Agency accepts FMS cases as requirements from the US military. These programs are a major source of defense services for government agencies and departments under the auspice of the Economy Act, as it is the primary purpose of building our partners’ capacity in support of the nation’s security forces. Further, it increases the nation’s capability to counter drugs, conduct counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations, and ensure the stability of multilateral peace programs.
  • “It’s the People, Stupid!”: Step One of Fixing the DOD’s Software Challenges

    The Department of Defense (DOD) is full of flawed software applications that create a frustrated workforce and result in countless hours wasted. In 2018, Congress was fed up and directed the Defense Innovation Board (DIB) to conduct a Software Acquisition and Practices Study to root out the problem. I led the smallest, but arguably the most important piece, of the study: the workforce subgroup. Our charge was to examine recruitment and retention hurdles of the workforce. In May 2019, the DIB published our final report, and what follows is a summary of our workforce subgroup. The accompanying article highlights the five major roadblocks we uncovered starting with the failures of the DOD to implement past recommendations to workforce development challenges. The article concludes with a set of concrete recommendations to put the department back on the right track and a real-world vignette to demonstrate the frustrations of the workforce. The desired end state is an empowered workforce capable of delivering software and technology in real-time to the men and women of the DOD.
  • China and the Issue of the South China Sea

    In this brief policy commentary, China’s “land reclamation efforts” and the historic origins of the international issue of this territorial dispute are discussed. Following an examination, various possible solutions are examined. Ultimately, a peer-level partnering with China may ultimately smooth the negotiating space to revisit the issues surrounding the South China Sea. However, without engendering a sense of trust, further progress that avoids escalation may be problematic in obtaining.
  • Japan Reborn: Rearmament for Pacifism

    Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe seeks a bold and unprecedented constitutional amendment to expressly acknowledge Japan’s Self-Defense Forces (SDF) and their limits. But why? Abe’s proposal embodies one of the Japanese Liberal Democratic Party’s (LDP) central political platforms, yet according to public opinion polling in Japan, such a proposal is very unlikely to pass in a referendum, assuming it first passes in both chambers of the Japanese Diet, as constitutionally required. This article supports a broader SDF mission but proposes an abandonment...
  • Thinking through the Unthinkable: Reducing Terrorist Threats in and around the Straits of Malacca and Singapore

    This article describes how the United States government can help shape a common sight picture of maritime threat detection in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore (Straits) by working cooperatively with Singapore’s Information Fusion Center to identify, target, and eliminate or reduce the threat of maritime terrorism. The geography of the Straits and the volume of shipping trade that passes through its waterways make the Straits a prime target for terrorists, and an ongoing security concern for the Indonesian government. Despite multi-nation coordination, joint maritime patrols and even local information or fusion centers, there remains much to improve Indonesia’s security posture and counterterrorism capabilities in and around the Straits.
  • Energy and Leadership

    Why is it important to know the different types of energy and how they relate to organizations? It is important because leaders are the custodians of the organizational energy. Leaders decide when and on what to spend the organizational energy. At any given moment, leaders are either adding to or using up organizational energy. Using up organizational energy is not bad or should not be frowned upon. Leaders have to use organizational energy to conduct the mission. However, leaders should be cognizant of their use of organizational energy and what the energy is applied toward.

More Viewpoints

Visit Other Air University Press Journals

The views and opinions expressed or implied in Wild Blue Yonder are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government or their international equivalents. ISSN 2689-6478