Crisis Response Preparedness, Security Cooperation, and U.S. Support to Peacekeeping Operations

  • Published
  • By SOUTHCOM & Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategies, Plans, and Capabilities

 

How is U.S. Security Cooperation enabling preparedness for crisis and disaster response, humanitarian assistance, and emerging transboundary challenges? As part of this broader security cooperation effort, the United States has a long history of financial support to United Nations Peacekeeping Operations (UN PKO). However, although it is the largest financial contributor to UN PKOs, the U.S. currently does not provide more than a handful of Military Observers and Military Experts on Mission to support field missions.

Within the context of evolving transboundary challenges, is it the right time for the U.S. to transition from primarily financial support to directly contributing logistical enablers—such as air mobility (fixed-wing and rotary-wing), engineering, line and short-haul motor transportation, medical, and signals communication? The U.S. possesses incredible logistical capabilities that are critical enablers for UN PKO missions and could fill the existing gaps in important PKO missions in areas such as Africa.

Before the U.S. provides such assets, what specific risks for both the U.S. and the UN need to be addressed? Specifically, how must command and control (C2) relationships, reimbursements, and potential casualties be managed to integrate U.S. forces successfully into these operations? Ultimately, what are the trade-offs between leveraging these U.S. capabilities for international crisis response and managing local perceptions of a U.S. military presence in field missions?