As the United States and its adversaries develop and field hypersonic weapons, how does the deployment of these rapid, highly maneuverable delivery platforms impact strategic nuclear deterrence calculations and potential escalation pathways? Specifically, does the dual-capable (conventional/nuclear) potential of hypersonic systems compress decision-making timelines to a degree that lowers the nuclear threshold or introduces dangerous failure modes in early-warning systems? To mitigate these risks of catastrophic miscalculation, how should the United States design and execute a strategic messaging playbook to communicate resolve and capability to adversaries, while simultaneously reassuring allies of extended deterrence commitments? Ultimately, what specific signaling mechanisms, declaratory policies, or crisis communication channels must the Joint Force prioritize to integrate hypersonic capabilities into our broader deterrence posture without inadvertently accelerating the path to nuclear escalation?
- Alba, Maj. Chris, "Streamlining and Revitalizing the US Hypersonic Weapon Investment Strategy," ACSC 2020, 17 pgs.
- Benson, Major Alex J., "Hypersonic Changes: Reassessing the Nuclear Triad in a New Arms Race," eSchool ACSC thesis, 2020, 67 pgs.
- Dougherty, Maj. Matthew J., "The Dragon's Tail: Deterring China in an Era of Maneuverable Hypersonic Weapons," ACSC SANDS paper, 2022, 90 pgs.
- Kerns, Maj. Ryan O., "Strategy in the Automation Age: Strategic Weapons Theory and Hypersonic Implications," SAASS thesis, 2023, 114 pgs.