U.S. Approach to Strategic Partnerships
TOPIC SPONSOR: HAF A5SM
What are strategies that can be used to enhance the Department's approach to strategic security, economic, and technology partnerships in the Asia-Pacific region?
-
Bishop, Dalene, "China's Claim to the South China Sea: Legal Legitimacy, Historical Justifications and Geopolitical Implications," AFGC thesis, 2025, 41 pgs.
-
Bishop argues that unilateral military actions like FONOPs have limited strategic deterrent value unless they are paired with diplomacy and coalition-building. To enhance its approach, the U.S. must promote the "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" (FOIP) strategy and strengthen integrated security ties with regional partners like the Philippines, Vietnam, Japan, and Australia. Furthermore, Bishop recommends leveraging multilateral strategic forums like the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad)—which includes the U.S., India, Japan, and Australia—to collaborate on maritime security and counter China's Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) threats reaching into the Second Island Chain.
-
Judd, Maj. Colby D., "Asymmetry in the West," AFGC thesis, 2025, 41 pgs.
-
Judd emphasizes that the US cannot overcome the "tyranny of distance" in the Pacific without significantly expanding its network of regional allies. He recommends building out the "hub-and-spoke" model of alliances. By expanding the spokes (treaty allies like Japan, Thailand, Australia, South Korea, and the Philippines) surrounding Taiwan and China, the US can secure distributed basing locations across multiple axes and apply coordinated diplomatic and economic pressure in the "gray zone" below the threshold of conflict.
Reynolds, Rachel L., "Leapfrogs and Shortcuts: Paths to Technological Performance on US and Chinese Strategic Evolutionary Landscapes," SAASS thesis, 2020, 101 pgs.
-
Small, Maj. Robert, "US Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Hybrid Approach to Consider Interdependence," ACSC elective paper (Asia Rebalance), 2020, 22 pgs.