Strategic Studies Quarterly

Volume 07 Issue 4 - Winter 2013


China's Nuclear Weapons and the Prospects for Multilateral Arms Control

Lt Gen Frank G. Klotz, USAF Retired and Oliver Bloom

The prospect of formal discussions with China on strategic stability and nuclear arms control will remain a distant prospect regardless of what US and Russian officials may ultimately desire. China’s secretive approach is a huge obstacle to meaningful talks.

Convergent Technologies and Future Strategic Security Threats
Robert McCreight

The chief challenge of the twenty-first century is whether advanced technologies and breakthroughs in science will be largely benign or spawn entire groups of sinister future weapons and will future advanced weapons technologies remain in the hands of peaceful nations.


China-US Relations: Moving Toward Greater Cooperation or Conflict
Adam Lowther, John Geis, Panayotis Yannakogeorgos, and Chad Dacus

One must understand the basic tenets of Chinese strategic culture before attempting to interpret Chinese actions and long-term ambitions. Once China’s strategic culture is understood, three variables—economic activity, activity in cyberspace, and developments in military technology—offer observers a sense of whether China is moving in the direction of cooperation or conflict.


Reforming Defense: Lessons for Arab Republics
Zoltan Barany

Democratic civil-military relations and defense reform for democratic states are important not just to set high standards, but also to be able to measure progress even if those standards may not be soon achieved by transitioning countries in the Middle East or elsewhere. Presented here is an ideal type of civil-military relations reform without illusions concerning the state of Arab polities.

Terrorism in China: Growing Threats with Global Implications
Philip B. K. Potter

Chinese policymakers have had notable success limiting both the volume and effectiveness of terrorist attacks on their own soil, but this relatively calm state of affairs is under increasing pressure and is rapidly changing…recent incidents suggest we may be entering a new, more volatile, phase…. from the US perspective there are potential upsides.

The Future of US Deterrence in East Asia: Are Conventional Land-Based IRBMs a Silver Bullet?
David W. Kearn Jr

China’s missiles now threaten key US bases, hold US naval forces in the region at risk, and pose a clear challenge for US policymakers. US experts have proposed deploying conventional land-based IRBMs in the region to offset this growing Chinese advantage and deter China from future aggression.

Demystifying Conventional Deterrence: Great Power Conflict and East Asian Peace
Jonathan F. Solomon

China’s rapidly improving regional military clout, the erosion of US military power, and the increasing friction between US and Chinese interests in East Asia highlight how critical it is that US strategists revisit conventional deterrence principles. A grand strategy decoupled from those principles risks a ruinous Sino-US war.

 Download in PDF Format

USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.

Join the Strategic Conversation

Visit the Air University Press on FacebookFacebook Logoand Join the Strategic Conversation.

What are your thoughts on SSQ?

Air University Press Logo
600 Chennault Circle
Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6010