HomeWild Blue YonderArticle Display

The views and opinions expressed or implied in WBY are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government or their international equivalents.

The Air Force Should Reevaluate Its Switch to the Operational Camouflage Pattern Uniform

Wild Blue Yonder / Maxwell AFB, AL --

 

When the Air Force announced that the service would switch to the Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP) uniform by 1 April 2021, there were some mixed reactions. For the most part, Airmen were happy and excited for an updated uniform change. It was said that the change would be made to help Airmen better fit in on the battlefield and improve joint integration, which are both very good reasons to enact this change. However, I would propose the idea that maybe the Air Force should not entirely switch to the same OCP pattern that the Army uses.

Airman 1st Class Julie Carr, Technical Sgt. Samuel Branch and Staff Sgt. Brian Elton review supply paperwork while processing new operational camouflage pattern uniforms for 124th Fighter Wing Airmen at the 124th Logistics Readiness Squadron warehouse, Gowen Field, Boise, Idaho, Jan. 22, 2020. The 124th FW is transitioning from wearing the airman battle uniform to OCP this year. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Ryan White)
Processing New Operational Camouflage Pattern Uniforms [Image 2 of 5]
Airman 1st Class Julie Carr, Technical Sgt. Samuel Branch and Staff Sgt. Brian Elton review supply paperwork while processing new operational camouflage pattern uniforms for 124th Fighter Wing Airmen at the 124th Logistics Readiness Squadron warehouse, Gowen Field, Boise, Idaho, Jan. 22, 2020. The 124th FW is transitioning from wearing the airman battle uniform to OCP this year. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Ryan White)
Photo By: Ryan White
VIRIN: 200122-Z-FS166-1001

(US Air National Guard photo by Ryan White)

Figure 1. Processing new Operational Camouflage Pattern uniforms. A1C Julie Carr, TSgt Samuel Branch, and SSgt Brian Elton review supply paperwork while processing new OCP uniforms for 124th Fighter Wing Airmen at the 124th Logistics Readiness Squadron warehouse, Gowen Field, Boise, Idaho, 22 January 2020. The 124th FW is transitioning from wearing the Airman Battle Uniform to OCP this year.

I am proposing this idea as a result of an experience I had with one of my friends just a few weeks ago. My friend was walking around his college campus (the same campus where I take part in Air Force ROTC) when he saw an Army ROTC cadet in her OCPs waiting at the bus station. Immediately, my friend texted me the name of the cadet, thinking she was a part of the Air Force ROTC, to see if I knew who she was. I, of course, did not know the cadet because she was a member of the Army detachment, not the Air Force one. I then sent him two photos, one of the Air Force Airman Battle Uniform pattern and the other of the Army OCP pattern, and asked him which photo her uniform looked like. He confirmed that she was in fact wearing the OCP pattern, which, therefore, led me to explain to him that she was an Army cadet and not an Air Force cadet. I then further explained to him that before too long one would be unable to tell an Army service member apart from an Air Force service member by merely the pattern of their uniform. This, of course, would be because they would eventually be wearing the same pattern. This idea puzzled him, and he asked me, “Why would two different services wear the same uniform?” When he asked me this, I did not know how to respond, because I had never really thought of it myself.

I pondered my friend’s question for several weeks thereafter, thinking about the confusion that two different military services wearing almost the same uniform could cause to the general public. I understood the Air Force’s reasoning for the switch for the tactical advantages that the pattern provides in different climates and accepted the fact that it probably is the best uniform for those deployed to potentially dangerous overseas situations. However, what about those Airmen who are stateside (CONUS), shouldn’t they wear something that distinguishes them from other services of our nation’s military?

My solution to this question is not a great one, and by all means, it is simply a suggestion that I am throwing out there for someone much more senior to me to consider. However, what if we had Airmen who are stationed CONUS wear a uniform pattern that looked nothing like any other service’s? That way, the general public of the country knows exactly which service an Air Force member belongs to as soon as they walk in the room. For example, the service could use a pattern similar to the Navy’s old Type I uniform pattern, with a mixture of various shades of blue, dark and lighter grays, and black tactical boots to top off the uniform. In my opinion, I just think this would be a way to boost morale for the entire service and help our US civilians distinguish Air Force service members from their Army counterparts.

Looking ahead, I am not against the Air Force’s idea to switch to the OCP uniform. I believe it is a very good-looking, tactically advantageous uniform that will be a great benefit to the entire service. However, I am suggesting the idea that down the road maybe we should look into designing our own signature uniform to set ourselves apart.

Cadet Lakin C. Tucker, Air Force ROTC

Cadet Tucker is a second-year cadet in West Virginia University’s Air Force ROTC (Detachment 915). He is a ROTC high school scholarship recipient and wants to become a civil engineer once he commissions into the Air Force. Outside of school he enjoys weightlifting, watching sports, and fishing.

USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.

Wild Blue Yonder Home